Choose examples that show different decisions
You can start with one strong sample. If you add more, make each one earn its place: a clear explanation, a well-paced story or a reaction with enough context. Repeating the same caption animation across many clips does not necessarily show more ability.
Show full clips a reviewer can watch from beginning to end. Effects compilations can be visually impressive while hiding whether you can select a complete thought or build a natural ending. The work should be understandable without a sales pitch.
Use footage you are allowed to share
Record your own material, get explicit permission or use a licence that allows the proposed editing and publication. Check music, logos and additional images as well as the main video. Keep a record of where the source came from and the permission attached to it.
Do not publish confidential campaign files or client work without permission. If you used a public figure in an authorised practice exercise, label it as a practice edit and do not suggest that person hired or endorsed you.
Explain your role beside the clip
Add a short note stating what you did: selected the passage, reframed the picture, corrected subtitles or cleaned up audio. If the source had existing captions or another editor contributed, say so. Clear attribution helps someone assess your actual skills.
Describe a decision, not an invented outcome. For example, explain why you removed a long introduction or left a pause for emphasis. Do not claim that the edit increased retention unless you have reliable evidence and permission to share it.
Make the link genuinely accessible
A simple public page or viewable collection is sufficient; you do not need to buy a portfolio website to apply. Make sure videos play, labels are readable on mobile and a reviewer is not asked to create an account or request access.
Open the link in a private browser window and test it on a phone. Avoid publishing private contact details, identity documents or confidential client information. Set the portfolio link to view-only rather than giving editing access.
Match the application to your real availability
The CUTVOLT bot asks for experience, a public work link and weekly availability. Answer according to what you can actually commit, not what you think sounds impressive. The sample is for assessment; submitting a link is not a certification of your skills.
Reviewing the application and offering a campaign are separate steps. Keep the portfolio up to date as you improve, and do not interpret an application or a shortlist as a guarantee of paid work.
The practical takeaway
A complete clip, an honest note about your role and a working public link are more useful than inflated claims.